Open phone About BUILDINGS-SELF-WOLVES, FENCES ON the BEACH,
Open phone About BUILDINGS-SELF-WOLVES, FENCES ON the BEACH,
MUNICIPAL PROBLEMS And CITY MONEY past Monday
On the questions of our readers set on "open phone", in
Newspaper edition "Sochi" was responded by the head of a city Leonid of the ROADWAY.
- Hello, my name is Vladimir Stepa-novich. The question will be
Not personal character also it is very unpleasant, of course, but do not aim mine
You to afflict. Session of Council of veterans, it today has taken place
General our pain. Contrary to your pre-election pledges, Leonid
Arkadevich, improvements in a city we do not see. More likely a naobo-mouth -
The resort decays, losing former privleka-telnost, losing
Having a rest... Are general words, I can tell
diamet-ralno the opposite... - And budget incomes fall...
- The city budget if you about him so worry (and I not less
Yours I worry), for two years it is increased in two and a half time.
If you find still somewhere in territory of the Russian Federation
Similar, I will be very grateful to you and with pleasure I will study
Experience of this territory. But figures - a thing obstinate. Municipal
The budget of 2000 has made 1 billion 119 million roubles, and
The municipal budget of this year, our profitable part,
Makes 2 billion 700 million. In an interval was only
2001. Compare two figures, and I think, more at you questions on
This subject will not be. I name figures without the grant from Moscow, these are those
Taxes which are raised in territory of a city of Sochi. I all the same
The economist, and concerning the budget I can not dissemble. These are documents
The strict reporting, and each rouble considered. - well give the God...
- You are disturbed again by ShCheblanova Ekaterina Mihajlovna, street
Specific, Matsestinsky valley. At all of us the same three questions. That at
Us with water? What with TP? And when there will be a gas? - Water at you will be,
Because pump we have bought. We have redeemed at sanatorium
Existing boiler-house, have bought the new equipment. Now it is possible
Will submit steadily water, moreover - further we will be
To work without sanatorium "Matsestinsky valley", municipal
Will be both networks, and pump. Jobs on a lining proceed
The pipeline outside the limits of a site of "the Matsestinsky valley" for
Maintenance of uninterrupted water supply of inhabited microdistrict. On
To gas the question should dare more close by the end of year as we will finish
Gas pipeline. While, like, we maintain all terms, here is not present
Any failures. On the electric power - like as at you it
Is... - It is, and light, thanks God, while like does not die away,
But over all of us time hangs a sword of Damocles that will go out. At us
There was such situation that sat without light, - something happens with
Cable, and this cable has appeared neutral. We call in MREP - they
Speak: it not ours. - at us, unfortunately, such here neutral
It is a lot of. That neutral to take on balance, it is necessary to declare, that
It neutral to wait as early as a year is under the law! - and only after
It to take away to itself. But it at all does not mean, that in a case
Impulse I will not repair. I will be. And TP, which at us
It is located in cafe "Rate" (when privatised this all, it
Have managed to sell together with substation), otkupaem back. That is
Such situation, that neutral also we will not do, already any more
Will be. The head of area Sychev very accurately knows, that ownerless at us
Under the earth in the form of networks, wires already is not present. Time on
Territories of Hostinsky area - we will and repair, and
To maintain.
- Leonid Arkadevich, I try to receive more year
The official lawful permission and documents to trade
Sun glasses. Whether it is possible to accelerate force of the power given to you
The decision of my question? - It is a question of portable trade? If
Only the place of your trade enters into a disposition, please,
Work. If does not enter and in this street of trading educations
Is not present and is not planned on a disposition for this purpose it is necessary to change
The decision which I also signed, about streamlining
Portable trade to bring solnuezashchitnye points in a category
Resolved for portable trade (besides only in limits
The disposition confirmed in area). - Well it is possible the decision
To increase this list?
- But then a question: why only sun glasses? And
Beach slippers? And Panamanians? And inflatable circles for a beach? And in general
Beach stock? This one clings to another... And then we
Again we come back to that industrial group of the goods
We deduce from stationary shops and it is let out on street. Here it
I do not wish to do. - but it is possible to such kind of the goods, as points,
To approach the same as have approached, let us assume, to a question on products
Agriculture - have decided, that all the same it is necessary to make it,
Because there are no shops with these departments?. - it is necessary to make, but
Where? Only in inhabited microdistricts, and at all on a beach
And not in places of the general using. I understand your desire and
Aspiration, but I explain the point of view: the resort goods
Should be on sale in stationary pavilions, which at us in
City today it is enough, even it is a lot of, and them a little bit
podsokratit it was necessary - we not a trading city, and resort. -
The resort always behind itself does business.
- I understand you, but in this question at us while the different
The points of view.
- Svetlana Vasilevna from Dagomys. In the end of last summer you
Personally said on TV, that our bridge which have taken down,
It will be constructed through two, as a last resort in three months. To
To each holiday to us promised this bridge, and till now people go
Through the railway. What can you tell on it? Will be here
Any change? - Will be, and it is obligatory, because money
I have allocated for this bridge.
- Yes money is allocated, but anybody does not work! Pieces of iron
Have put, they lay - and all. - the contractor is defined,
Financing... But for the call of thanks very unpleasant for me
Call... - Unpleasant, I think. Because this your promise.
You personally promised it. - I will fulfil this promise.
- My name is Olga Mihajlovna. I concerning an extension. In 1994
To year our neighbours on Gagarin, 42 had been made an extension. The god
From it. But in 96th year they without the consent of tenants have begun the new
Building from an end face. Tehnadzor has forbidden, Kazankov has forbidden, and it with 16
May of this year has delivered a material, has started over again to build, has told:
kostmi I will lay down, but all the same I will construct. Where to us to address? -
The extension borders on your apartment?
- It it is direct under my apartment.
- You agreed to this extension?
- Did not give.
- In this case I can tell to you: if though one of tenants,
Who on smezhestvu with this extension is, did not give the
The consent, the extension is autocratic and is subject to a pulling down. I
I will direct there our town-planning inspection. If is not present
Documents, - whatever has constructed, I will take down. It I to you am perfect
Officially I speak.
- She is Pankova Galina Alekseevna from street Komsomol. We were
At you on reception on October, 25th, 2001 concerning gas carrying out.
We are engaged in this question from 96th year. You have given OK and
Have told, that will help to spend gas. But ours domouprav Hudojants still
Did not take specifications though at you then has told, that already
Has received specifications.... We wrote you the complaint on February, 1st
2002, but answer till now have not received. How to us to be? - I
I remember our conversation and I remember statements of chief MREPa that
Specifications are, it is necessary to switch on in the plan only
Financings. It just the most difficult but if you speak,
That have not got to the plan of financing of that is not present
Specifications for me it is very serious call on
To occasion of that my officials respond on reception
To citizens, and, leaves, I from their giving am compelled to appear
The talker? For thanks call, with Hudojantsem I now will understand.
- Trouble at us in a city here in what: the easy approach is reduced
To the sea though you publicly promised availability galechnoj strips. -
For a year of my job of any new private beach in territory
Cities of Sochi have not appeared. Has appeared - show me it,
Please... - Though three! A beach of sanatorium "Black Sea Coast", a name
Morisa Toreza (only has appeared accurate zaborchik, in the centre
Beach strip laid out by a tile pjatachki, fenced with a lattice -
Probably, for trade) and hotel "Star". - I Explain. That
Concerns "Black Sea Coast", in the decision in black and white
It is written down (and I to change it I am not going to): the quay is saved,
Access on quay and on galechnuju a strip should be. That is
The closed zone at them, on idea, hardly below quay - there beach
Constructions etc. Galechnaja the strip should be opened. It is a question
Cutting off a turnstile or to make that we will be
To do with "Star": a fence to leave, for night of a collar
To close, but all light day they should be opened, that
On a beach there was an easy approach. About a paid input speech at all
It is conducted.
- But while in general no input is present.
- Naturally. Jobs come to an end, a beach yet
It is maintained, but the problem is put, and management "Star" with
Her has agreed. And on sanatorium of name Morisa Toreza... The Second
May I there passed, did not see anything. If something have constructed -
Thanks for the information, I will understand. - than these fences
Motivated, but after all it is bad. We never will be
Civilised resort if there will be here these lattices and
To partition off the sea. - it agree. But we have that we have. We
Began all the same as a resort, sanatorium complex, and in
Sanatorium at us beach services traditionally enter. We cannot
All beach to partition off. But here in all territory from mouth Mzymty
And to "the Southern beach" at us anywhere the beach is not closed, and is
Possibility to make beautiful quay. There is in Lazarevsky a such
Fragment... Zaborchik on the Riversky beach to me too the eye does not please.
But today it is ready to close on it eyes because we will clean in general
Fence - we will lose a beach. Well people at us such, unfortunately, - will be
To walk there dogs, you will not save enough watchmen. Well somehow it is necessary
To save!. It would be desirable something beautiful to see on coast and in that
Time not to close. How to find reasonable kopromiss? And on
City beach the owner is necessary. This year last, when a beach
Housing and communal services management is engaged. I am ready
To pass beaches in areas, to form the municipal enterprises,
Which would be engaged exclusively in beaches, up to that,
To plant them on budgetary financing. A beach strip at
Us should not earn. The city should earn money on
Volume, that these people have arrived here, to the sea.
<$>
//* an information Source: Sochi, 23.05.02
//* Reg. Nom. - 2120500097.04-------------------------------------------
|
