"Ирис Конгресс Отель"

Коровинское ш., д.10

русский | english




главная

номера

бары и рестораны

контакты

Whether the special status is necessary to Petrozavodsk?

				
				
				
We recommend: city hotel mosca.
Whether the special status is necessary to Petrozavodsk? On May, 24th this year chamber of republic of Legislative Assembly Republics the bill "About the status is accepted in the first reading Republic Kareliya capitals ", brought by the Petrozavodsk city Council. The impression makes the specified bill rather The ambiguous. Petrozavodsk on the legal status - Municipal union, should submit to the legislation about Local government. And the local government urged to solve The problems of local value specified in Law RK "About the local Self-management in Republic Kareliya ". Simply speaking: Local governments of Petrozavodsk are created for Maintenance of normal ability to live large in scales City republics, instead of for its successful functioning in Quality of capital of Kareliya. For worthy position of capital should To respond the state in the name of its legislative and executive Bodies, instead of the local governments which are not entering in Government system. Expecting objections of opponents that Constitutions of Russia and Our republic fix possibility of transfer of the separate Powers of the state to local governments, I will notice, That a legislature of Russia and our republic speak about Possibilities of such transfer, instead of oblige to do it. Possibility at the state to assign the powers on Not state bodies is available. Whether only is in it Necessity? To whom is such transfer favourable? It is thought, that Additional loading in the form of performance of the state problems On Petrosovet and administration of Petrozavodsk it is not called The slightest shred of necessity. Not going into detail of a bill, I can notice, that Powers of self-government institutions of Petrozavodsk on realisation Functions of capital of Republic are stated it is declarative, in many respects Duplicate that it is offered to execute to local government in Force of the law on him. To public authorities of republic developers The bill take away a modest role on assistance rendering To Petrozavodsk in realisation of functions of capital of Kareliya by it. On mine The sight, all is put upside down. The main negative moment The bill became, in my opinion, that it provides Additional financial injections in the budget of Petrozavodsk from ... Fund of financial support of local budgets in the form of 10 Percent from settlement specifications. Such perekachivanie the financial Means can promote only uncontrolled, no-purpose them To expenditure local governments of Petrozavodsk. And Nobody can differentiate: How much money has left on expenses of a city as capital, and How much - on performance of direct duties municipal Education, as concept Petrozavodsk-capital and Petrozavodsk-city are inseparable. Not speaking about the possible Abusings from the city power, it is necessary to see, that To Petrozavodsk concessionary terms to the detriment of another are created To municipal unions. After all the additional financial Means over expenses for needs of a city will reduce the sizes of the financial The help to other cities, villages, republic settlements. It, in my opinion, obvious display of ambition from the party Local governments of Petrozavodsk. They it is perfect Abstract from that the lion's share of charges and The city accomplishment bears the republican government. At the expense of means of the budget of republic many are repaired Administrative and cultural-social buildings, roads in a city. Pawning in a bill redistribution of financial assets Fund of support of local budgets to own advantage, Petrosovet not Thinks of that this fund is formed and at the expense of payments Territories in it. In Petrozavodsk - the most part of all educational Institutions, cultural-mass establishments, hotels, which Receive incomes, including at the expense of inhabitants of republic, instead of Only its capitals. I do not exclude, as the authors who have become by subjects of the legislative Initiatives, and deputies of chamber of the republic, passed the law in The first reading, pursue the far-reaching aim - to secure Support of voters of Petrozavodsk on coming in the spring 2002 Year elections. That such attraction of electorate becomes on The party immoral methods, my colleagues not Reflect. Special attention was always given and given to Petrozavodsk In every respect from the government. Petrosovetu it There is not enough, he wishes to become the absolute owner of a city, Being republic capital, having transformed the government Republics in the assistant in realisation of "most important tasks". Of one it is deeply convinced: the capital inhabitant should not live Better the provincial only owing to geographical or Demographic position. If the capital of republic also requires the special status, the law About him should be accepted in such kind, that in him at all Local governments of Petrozavodsk were mentioned. The state, as mother of the is obliged to contain capital The child and not to pass it on soderzhdanie and education To relatives. Going on a way of an establishment of the special status, everyone The city of republican value can act as the initiator The law on its exclusive position in comparison with others Settlements where there live the same citizens of Kareliya. To To happiness, it does not occur. It is convinced, that it is impossible to approach with Double standards to equal subjects - municipal To educations which are also Petrozavodsk, and Belomorsky area, And Kostomuksha. I consider, that there is necessity of giving to Petrozavodsk no special The status - republic capitals. Article 15 of the Constitution of republic Proclaims Petrozavodsk capital RK and it is quite enough of it That at formation of the republican budget Means to Petrozavodsk as to republic capital were provided. It is necessary to remove the bill "About the status of capital of Republic Kareliya "from the further consideration. I think, that inhabitants of Kareliya Will support this position. However, it would be desirable to know the public Opinion. Alexey KOKKOV, the head of self-management Kemi and area, the deputy The Houses of Representatives of Legislative Assembly of republic. <$> //* an information Source: Northern courier (Kareliya), 8.09.01 //* Reg. Nom. - 1110900070.15-------------------------------------------